Braden State

Outliers – Discussion #4 – Due Nov 4/Nov 6

trippisu — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:14:01 +0000

Ch. 5 – Three Lessons from Joe Flom

Lesson 1: Why was it important that Joe Flom was Jewish, how did this help his career?
Lesson 2: What was the perfect time for children with the Terman study to be born? Why? What benefits according to the text are there of being born in a small generation, and how did this affect Joe Flom?
Lesson 3:

Why was it so critical for Jewish families to arrive in New York City in the 1890s with a background in sewing? What about their background and values made their success possible?
What was Borgenicht getting out of his 18 hour days?
What do autonomy, complexity, and a connection between effort and reward have to do with a career? Why was Louis Borgenicht dancing a jig when he was still “penniless and desparate”? Is this similar to how the Beatles and Bill Gates reacted to their circumstances? How might this affect the attitudes of the Borgenicht children?
Why was Joe Flom successful? What were his opportunities and what conditions helped create him? Be specific, as there are multiple reasons.

Outliers – Discussion #3 – Due Oct 28/Oct 30

trippisu — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:11:30 +0000

Ch. 3 – The Trouble with Geniuses Part I

Threshold effect

Explain the threshold effect regarding Nobel Peace Prize winners, NBA basketball players, and Michigan law school students, especially minority students. Relate the brick and blanket divergence test to the threshold effect. According to Terman’s research and findings, are intellect and achievement “perfectly related”?

Ch. 4 – Trouble w/ Geniuses Part II

Analytical v. Practical Intelligence

1. Why does Robert Oppenheimer succeed when Chris Langan does not? In your discussion include:

Define practical intelligence procedurally, practically, and critically.
Which is better to have: practical or analytical, why?

2. Explain which social class is more likely to have practical intelligence or a sense of “entitlement,” what occurs as a result of this entitlement, and where does this social mastery come from?

3. What is the plain truth of the Terman study regarding outliers and relationship to social class?

4. Why don’t people or even outliers make it alone? (cite references from text)

The Tipping Point #8 – Due Dec 4/Dec 6

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:55:31 +0000

Chapter 7: Case Study: Suicide, Smoking and the Search for the Unsticky Cigarette

Answer all:

A. The epidemics of suicide and smoking are complex and largely unconscious contagions with far more subtle undercurrents at work. One explanation beyond rationale is that as humans we get permission to act by seeing others engage in deviant acts. When we engage in dangerous or reckless behavior of any kind, how much of our decision to do so is conscious versus unintentional?

B. What are your opinions on the nature vs. nurture debate? Do you agree that environment plays a bigger role in shaping and influence children than genetics and personality?

C. “Telling teenagers about the health risks of smoking — it will make you wrinkled! It will make you impotent! It will make you dead! — is useless,” says Judith Harris. Is this morally incomprehensible advice or the sad truth? What do you think about the psychologist David Rowe’s theory that “the role of parents is a passive — providing a set of genes at loci relevant to smoking risk, but not socially influencing their offspring?” Should parents spend more time trying to monitor and shape their children’s peer group than correcting and disciplining them in the home?

D. Do you agree that instead of fighting experimentation, which is a natural and unavoidable fate of growing up, we should be rather focusing on diminishing the consequences of that experimentation? For example instead of forbidding your child from consuming alcohol when he goes out or proselytizing about the dangers of under-age drinking, should parents rather ensure there is a sober, designated driver at one of their parties? What other examples can you come up with based in this approach.

The Tipping Point #7 – Due Nov 27/Nov 29

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:53:44 +0000

Chapter 6: Case Study: Rumors, Sneakers and the Power of Translation

Answer all:

A. Do you believe that it was essentially the ‘cool’ marketing campaign that tipped the Airwalk trend? Can you think of other more current products that have exploded onto the market with an equally impressive advertising assault? Would Apple computers and the iPod phenomenon, for example, be as popular if it didn’t have it’s signature marketing campaign?

B. All kinds of high-tech products fail, never making it beyond the Early Adopters, because companies fail to transform an idea that makes perfect sense to an Early Adopter to one that makes perfect sense to a member of the Early Majority. Do you know of any examples of products or ideas that looked like they had great potential but never seemed to make it to the mainstream?

C. How do weird, idiosyncratic things that really cool kids do end up in the mainstream? They are translated from a highly specialized world into a language the rest of us can understand. So, when we judge things as being weird and idiosyncratic are we really saying that we just don’t understand it? It’s not the product but our interpretation of it that is limited? Could everything, if ’sugarcoated’ in a way we recognize, ultimately, become palatable and even enjoyable?

The Tipping Point #6 – Due Nov 18/Nov 20

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:51:47 +0000

The Power of Context – Part II

Answer two of the three:

A. The Ya-Ya Sisterhood epidemic reveals the critical role that groups play in social epidemics. Psychologists tell us much the same thing: that when people are asked to consider evidence or make decisions in a group, they come to very different conclusions than when they are asked the same questions by themselves. Can we ever really make a decision in a vacuum, solely based on our own feelings, or do our peers or surroundings always influence us somehow?

B. The Rule of 150 suggests that the size of the group is another one of those subtle contextual factors that can make a big difference. Groups under the size of 150 are more effective as they can exploit the bonds of memory and peer pressure. Is there a particular group or organization that you consider successful and if so, what do you think makes them so effective?

C. If peer pressure is more powerful than the concept of a boss would you work harder for a boss whom you are friendly with because you care more what they think?

The Tipping Point #5 – Due Nov 11/Nov 13

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:50:38 +0000

Chapter 4 – The Power of Context (Part I)

Answer four of the six:

A. The Power of context infers that epidemics are sensitive to the conditions and circumstances of the times and places in which they occur. Are certain individuals more sensitive to their environment than others? Think of examples of behavior as a function of social context. How often or to what extent does the environment dictate your behavior i.e. your conduct when at the opera versus being at a baseball game?

B. The Broken Windows Theory argues that crime is the inevitable result of disorder. It suggests that crime is contagious. Do you agree or do you think this risks excusing a criminal’s culpability?

C. Most conservative theories say that the criminal is a personality type whereas the Broken Windows theory and Power of Context suggest the opposite — the criminal is actually someone acutely sensitive to his environment and who is prompted to commit crimes based on his perceptions of the world around him. Which theory do you believe?

D. With the subway example, the problem of farebeating snowballed because people joined in after watching others do it. Are humans instinctively conformists who mimic the behavior they see around them?

E. The experiment led by Zimbardo, where they looked at why prisons are such nasty places, they showed that specific situations are so powerful that they overwhelm our inherent predispositions. If we improved the living conditions in prisons, do you believe it could impact on inmates’ behavior?

F. How does one explain certain exceptional figures like Gandhi and Mandela who were subject to the most brutal and atrocious conditions yet immerged seemingly uncorrupted?

The Tipping Point #4 – Due Nov 4/Nov 6

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:48:22 +0000

Chapter 3 – The Stickiness Factor

Answer three of the five:

A. Sesame Street was an example of how an agent of infection (television) was able to infect a positive virus (literacy). What are some other examples of sticky messages that aren’t as beneficial in culture?

B. What makes a message memorable? What about the commercial we dislike and we only recall because it irritated us so intensely? Haven’t the advertisers fulfilled their purpose by the sheer fact you remember their commercial? Does this mean that the cliché “even bad publicity is good publicity” is right? If something gets noticed and sticks in the viewer’s mind then does the nature of the message not matter?

C. We have become, in our society, overwhelmed by people clamoring for our attention. This information age has created a stickiness problem. Has the excessive amount of choice proved counter-productive for American consumerism? For instance, walking down the cereal aisle at the supermarket do you:

A) Buy way more than you need after spotting 3 new attractive, discounted products.
B) Head straight to your regular brand, walking out with the same cereal you have had since you were a kid.
C) Become paralyzed with indecision and leave after 2 hours with a loaf of bread?

D. What are some of the desperate measures taken by advertisers, publicists and celebrities to get noticed and stay in the limelight? How has the level of shock tactics used to grab public attention escalated and changed over time? Do we risk become totally desensitized as a culture, immune to the eyebrow-raising, attention-grabbing ploys of marketers?

E. Do you think that children’s television shows like Sesame Street and Blues Clues are more educational and ’stickier’ than books? Explain why.

The Tipping Point #3 – Due Oct 28/Oct 30

trippisu — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:46:03 +0000

Chapter 2 – The Law of the Few

A. Connectors — the kinds of people who know everyone and possess special gifts for bringing the world together. What kind of careers and job titles would you expect Connectors to have? Connectors are defined by having many acquaintances, a sign of social power, but do you think a Connector privileges quantity over quality? How do Connectors embody the maxim “it’s not what you know but who you know?”

B. Maven — means one who accumulates knowledge and who has information on a lot of different products or prices or places. Could anyone be a maven if they just have the diligence and desire to learn a specific craft or area of knowledge?

C. Salesmen — are the select group of people with the skills to persuade us when we are unconvinced of what we are hearing. Discuss what you think makes a good salesman? Think about the last time you were in a store and what you liked or didn’t like about the retail person assisting you? Have you ever felt suckered into buying something or recognized the only reason you bought an item (or even one in ever color) was because of the person selling it to you?

D. What would you describe yourself as — a connecter, maven or salesman? Think of the people you know and who out of them best exemplifies these categories and why.

The Outliers Discussion #2

trippisu — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:19:12 +0000

Chapter Two: The 10,000 Hour Rule

According to Gladwell, what is the 10,000 hour rule (Cite key points that make this theory accurate, what is necessary)? Is it enough to just do something for 10,000 hours? Can someone just naturally be good at the piano, or baseball, or some other endeavor, or do we all have to work at something diligently, with the intent of improving to acheive greatness? Cite Gladwell’s research and thoughts from Chapter 2 in your answer.

The Tipping Point Discussion #2

trippisu — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:14:20 +0000

CHAPTER ONE: The Three Rules of Epidemics

The Law of the Few:

3. The 80/20 Principle states that in any situation roughly 80 percent of the ‘work’ will be done by 20 percent of the participants. This idea is central to the Law of the Few theory where a tiny percentage of people do the majority of work. But say you took those 20 people who do all the “work” away, would changes or epidemics never occur or would the next 20 people step into that role and assume the position of “workers”? Is one born an exceptional person, a ‘one of the few,’ or could someone eventually learn how to become a member of this exceptional group?

Stickiness Factor:

4. Stickiness means that a message makes an impact and doesn’t go in one ear and out the other. Take a simple, every day example of this. Think about a song that you couldn’t get out of your head or that television commercial you still remember from when you were a kid. Could you pinpoint what it is you think makes them “sticky?”

The Power of Context:

5. This says that human beings are a lot more sensitive to their environment than they may seem. How attuned are you to your environment and its effect on you? Have you felt your mood change because of the surroundings even if it’s as subtle as standing near a couple in a bitter argument or being in a cluttered, messy bedroom?